Viewing is possession – counter, absent statement, cannot prove viewing

In New Jersey and in some other jurisdictions, mere viewing makes ones guilty of possession. Of course, this has to be a knowing viewing so the accident defense still works. However, if the defendant at least admits to viewing multiple files, this theory start to lose credibility and thus, the defendant may be found guilty of possession.

 

Absent a confession, it will be difficult for the State to prove that the contraband files were ever viewed. The State may try to argue that the files were accessed at a specific time but access does not equate to viewing. In fact, access doesn’t even mean that a human did anything with the file. The system could have caused the filed to be accessed for any number of reasons.

Morristown Child Pornography Lawyer

Advertisements

Posted on May 11, 2013, in The State's Tactics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: